Unified Fare Payment and Chicago Bike Share

There hasn’t been a lot of recent news about the bike share system coming to Chicago (hopefully) this spring. As Twitter user @JustinHaugens points out, Alta Bike Share (a consulting firm) only recently posted management positions for Chicago (here’s one).

At this point, we really have no idea what the stations will look like, but we can look to Capital Bikeshare in DC and Nice Ride in Minneapolis to get an idea, since Alta played a role in both systems’ development.

Capital Bikeshare station. Credit: Bike Arlington.

We also don’t know what the “key” will look like, but here’s another idea:

Capital Bikeshare key used to unlock bicycles. Credit: Mr. T in DC

Ideally, the “key” used to unlock a bike at a station should not be a unique, distinct key, but instead should be integrated with the rest of Chicago’s transportation payment methods.

It’s a bit of a stretch to believe this would have happened initially, especially since not every transportation option in Chicago currently has the same payment system. But this is exactly how it should be. Everyone in the Chicago region should be able to use one card to pay for all public transportation in the region: Metra, Pace, CTA, and, soon, bike share.

I’m not in the position to suggest who exactly should oversee such a payment system or ensure that payment makes its way to the correct transportation entity, but the point is that it should exist in the future. So many American cities have disconnected transportation payment mechanisms. New York in particular is pretty awful at this: On a recent trip visiting a friend in Jersey City, a trip to Manhattan requires taking the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail ($2.25 per ride), then a PATH train ($2.25), and, depending on the destination, a ride on the Subway ($2.25). All require different farecards. Indeed, New York and New Jersey are different states, but we should expect more cooperation among transportation networks in the country’s largest metropolitan region. This is not unique, either; many cities across the country require different fare payments on their different transportation systems.

We’ll go across the Atlantic to—you guessed it—Paris, where transportation in the region (Ile-de-France) is spread across different brands, service levels, and government entities but is unified by one payment mechanism, including the bike share system, Vélib. The Syndicat des transports d’Île-de-France (STIF), or “Transport Organization Authority”, oversees the transportation in the region (similar to RTA in Chicagoland). You can get a ride from the suburbs on a regional Transilien or RER train to central Paris, where you can transfer to the Metro, and finally grab a bike from a Vélib station, all using just one card: The Navigo pass.

Wireless Vélib card used to unlock bike at staion.

You can, of course, still buy paper tickets (which are still unified across modes) for the Metro, RER, or Transilien, or get a Vélib card if you don’t use public transportation often. Paying the fare doesn’t get one a ride on Vélib, though: a separate annual subscription is still required, it’s just loaded onto the same card. In the future, you’ll likely be able to use your phone to do the same thing.

It should be noted that Paris is perhaps unique in integrating all modes, for even London’s Cycle Hire has not integrated its payment system with the Oyster card. If you’re aware of other cities that do integrate their bike share systems with their public transportation payment systems, let me know in the comments.

If CDOT were to talk with CTA and find a way to integrate the future bike share system with the forthcoming Ventra card, it could reduce a significant barrier to using the bike share system. If we assume the Chicago system will be similar to Minneapolis and DC, it means having to register online to receive a key or pay-per-day at a kiosk. By offering an option to pay an extra few dollars per month or year on the unlimited Ventra card in order to use bike share, a new connection could be made between CTA and a user’s final destination, and increase use of the bike share system. When the day comes where Metra integrates Ventra, it could create even more options. Could we see the day where denser suburbs, like Evanston and Oak Park, have their own bike share systems that also integrate with Ventra?

Aside from the payment mechanism, how the bikes are released is also important – if it is to be like Nice Ride, where the key is inserted into a slot to release the bike, it means there is no immediate possibility to implement wireless cards at the stations to release a bike. If wireless cards were implemented instead, we could see people unlocking bikes using smartphones, RFID-enabled credit cards, Ventra, or the bike share’s own card. It could even go so far as to wireless hotel keys being linked to the system – 24-hour memberships paid by hotels to help their guests get around, or single-use cards being issued for certain events.

Without a doubt, Alta has looked around the world at the best practices for bike share and has created some amazing systems. The fragmented organization of our city governments has also ensured that many of our transportation systems are inefficient. Smart transportation networks bridge the gap between these inefficiencies and create systems that are easy to navigate. A major part of this is ensuring that people can use the different systems with a common payment system. Hopefully, we will see more of this in the future.

EDIT: An earlier version of this post incorrectly stated that Alta manages Nice Ride in Minneapolis. Alta merely provided assistance in station location and site design guidelines.

Union Station feels a little brighter

I haven’t taken a train to or from Union Station in Chicago for a few months, but today I noticed that many of the lights in the station felt a little brighter.

20130104-131913.jpg

North concourse of Union Station, Chicago. Credit: Shaun Jacobsen.

 

According to the Union Station website, many of the station’s lightbulbs were changed recently. As a result, there is an annual savings of 3,142,932 kWh, or $336,402 in energy costs, annually.

Union Station always felt a little dreary (the Great Hall notwithstanding), if not because of the lightbulbs, because of the low ceilings or pollution from the diesel trains on the tracks. It feels a little brighter now.

Chicago Union Station’s unfortunately underused Great Hall. Credit: Wikipedia.

It would take some high ceilings and natural light for Union Station to feel like a more “European” station. That’s not to say that we should be building stations modeled after European stations, but most of them do feel airier and brighter. Most trains in Europe are also electrified, meaning no local pollution.

Gare du Nord in Paris

Gare du Nord in Paris. The regional/international station is also connected to Metro lines 4 and 5, and RER lines B and D. Credit: Wikipedia.

It’s worth noting different train station designs around the world. I haven’t visited many stations in America outside Europe, since we don’t have a very decent regional train network in the U.S., but I do know that there are some gems. I have visited Grand Central in New York, whose concourse is very open (the tracks are not). I’ve also heard that Union Station in Washington, D.C. is very nice. It would be nice if the Great Hall in Union Station could see more “life” like Grand Central.

If you’ve seen “airier” and “brighter” train stations here in the States, where are they?

Hypnotizing Videos of Public Transportation Networks

Through a link I found on Planetizen which linked me to Wired, I found some videos of visualizations of public transportation systems around the world.

Here’s Chicago’s, whose grid pattern is hypnotizing:

Here’s New York’s, which just looks like a mess (a highly efficient mess, I might add):

All of the videos (of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Boston, Manchester, Austin, Montréal, Washington, D.C., Auckland, Seattle, and Vancouver) can be watched here. They’re pretty interesting, especially if you know a city’s geography. The patterns of movement are easily seen (in Chicago, for example, you can find the CBD easily; in New York’s, you can easily find Manhattan but the differences between Queens and Brooklyn are less distinct).

My Long Weekend in New York City

I recently got back from a short-ish vacation in New York City. I’ve been to New York once before but I was younger and hadn’t yet studied cities, the urban environment, sociology, or urban planning, so it wasn’t as interesting then as it is now. I do remember remarking on how mind-bogglingly large and populated Manhattan is and the sheer amount of people that move about it every day.

While I was there I walked – a lot. I believe the most I walked in a day was around 15 miles. The only thing I brought home were blisters on my feet! I love walking around cities and exploring aimlessly, and New York’s dense neighborhoods, stellar parks, and architectural eye candy were perfect. In all my walking and exploring, I noticed a few things about transit and the different ways to get around in New York. Continue reading

Redundancy in Transportation after Hurricane Sandy

In the wake of Hurricane Sandy, which ravaged much of the East Coast of the U.S. earlier this week but left New Jersey and New York particularly scathed, we’ve seen the degree of resiliency that people are able to exhibit after such a tragedy. Of particular interest not only to myself and others who are interested in transportation, but also to anyone who needs to move from point A to B, is how transportation is affected during natural tragedies like this.

According to the constantly-updating wealth of articles by The New York Times on the subject, walking and biking have become the only efficient way to get around Manhattan (or between closer points in the adjacent boroughs/New Jersey). Mayor Bloomberg initiated a 3-person minimum on all cars entering Manhattan and the MTA ceased collecting fares.

NYT: Long Lines for Shuttle Buses

Long waits for shuttle buses at the Barclays Center. Credit: Seth Wenig/Associated Press.

Many parts of the New York City Subway, including all service connecting Brooklyn and Manhattan below 34th St. are out of service and MTA buses are replacing service. Apparently the streets of Manhattan are so congested, buses are having a hard time running on the streets normally – also certainly due to much-increased demand.

Post-Sandy NYC Subway

A temporary New York City Subway map. Click for full PDF. Credit: MTA.

To be honest, I don’t know why Mayor Bloomberg is allowing any cars into Manhattan. The whole City would do better to clear the streets for use by emergency and very-high demand vehicles (i.e. buses). But the decision is the result of strategic emergency planning, and officials can only learn from situations like these.

With the sudden increase in biking to get around in light of the disaster, could New Yorkers be awakened to the benefits? I can’t tell if this is Copenhagen or New York City:

New York Cyclists

Biking and walking over the Queenboro Bridge. Credit: Clarence Eckerson Jr./Streetsblog.

With major disruptions in New York City’s greenest asset – its Subway – come major changes in how people get around. Without a doubt, the bicycle is a great tool in getting people moving again. No infrastructure to replace or repair, no concern about space usage (bikes are smaller than humans, unlike single-occupancy vehicles), and no real possibility of running out of fuel (or the conflict that ensues). The only problem might be the lack of dedicated space for cyclists!

It seems odd to ponder the post-disaster effects so quickly after the disaster, but the resiliency of people in America’s most populated megaregion is fascinating. With each of the two presidential candidates silent on climate change, sustainability, public transportation, or even cities at all, something good that can come out of a disaster in the international spotlight is a discussion about the future of the environment and how we can make our cities even more resilient in the face of disaster. And something else we can think about is the future of transportation – not just during a disaster, but all the time.

Few are talking about it yet, but a hurricane of this proportion (the storm system extended to Lake Michigan) was probably so big because of climate change. Such dramatic change in weather can be mitigated by less/more efficient energy usage. This doesn’t mean switching to electric cars, like many politicians think (because it is an easy way to sound “green” without telling people to stop driving so much), because electric cars still use energy, no matter what it’s generated from. Walking and biking don’t use anything except human energy. They also seem to be the only reliable way to get around in desperate times, for no other reason than their simplicity and inexpense.

South Ferry Station Flooded

New York City Subway’s relatively new South Ferry Station is flooded. Luckily, residents have more than one way of getting around. Credit: Craig Ruttle/Associated Press.

Technological advances, like the automobile, also have the downside that complete and total investment and dedication to their use doesn’t create redundancy. Your bank stores data in multiple data centers just in case disaster strikes one. In the same fashion, New York City and other dense cities have redundancy in mobility – you can walk, you can bike, you can take a bus or train, or you could drive. You can’t say the same about most suburbs and rural areas, which have been developed because of and for the automobile. There is no redundancy in mobility when the automobile is the sole way of getting around.

Lining up for gasoline is not redundancy in transportation. Reports of conflict among gas-hungry motorists have surfaced. Credit: Reuters.

Just a thought about the future of transportation and people moving. Redundancy is key not only in times of disaster, but also in quality living. A community that offers several ways of getting around is healthy, safe, and built to withstand even major challenges. This isn’t about radicalizing the roadways. It’s about changing the infrastructure to accomodate more diverse uses. Many communities have realized this and began to change accordingly. The future depends on it.